Production: September, October, November, December, January

A catch-up post with production for September through January. You can really see Hurricane Sandy in the results… There was fortunately no damage to the panels, nothing blew off the house, but down the street a tree blew down and knocked out the power lines. Our power was out for six days, and as we knew when we wrote out the solar power pros and cons list, the system would be of no use to us as a power backup generator. This didn’t stop neighbors saying, “at least you’ve got your solar panels!” during the power outage, and us having to explain that no, we were not getting any power from the solar panels. Despite the resulting poor power production for October, we are still doing quite well overall at 95% of the original projection to-date, with just three more months until we’ve got a full year’s results under our belt. So with three months to go we’re already at more than a 14% yield on our investment. Even if it takes three months for the Winter-Storm-Nemo snow to melt and we produce no power for the next three months, we’re already at a great return number. Here’s the month-by-month since September:

September: 97% of Projected
——————————
Projected kWh per panel: 27.01
Actual kWh per panel: 26.22

October: 74% of Projected
——————————
Projected kWh per panel: 22.56
Actual kWh per panel: 16.78

November: 108% of Projected
——————————
Projected kWh per panel: 13.44
Actual kWh per panel: 14.50

December: 91% of Projected
——————————
Projected kWh per panel: 13.06
Actual kWh per panel: 11.89

January: 104% of Projected
——————————
Projected kWh per panel: 14.83
Actual kWh per panel: 15.39

Lifetime: 95% of Projected (214.33 actual vs 226.28 projected)

Posted in Energy Production | Leave a comment

Cool Solar Gadget: “Rainbow-maker”

Here’s something neat we’ve been enjoying, it’s a solar powered device that attaches to a window by suction cup… and at the time of day that full sun pours through the window onto it, its little solar panel generates enough power to turn a series of little gears (which you can watch, the plastic is transparent), which turns a prism. The prism casts rainbows all over the room. They make a “single” and a “double” version with one or two prisms. Rainbow-makerWe originally received the “double” version as a gift several years ago, it was a lot of fun while it lasted but we must have knocked that thing to the floor by accident a half dozen times and after a series of successful repairs eventually one day it met its demise. But during its life we got a lot of enjoyment out of it, even though our apartment only got enough sun that it could be found spinning its prisms at only the right time of day for a short while. Double Rainbow-makerFast forward to present, and we once again came across this gadget, seeing it in the gift shop of the Cradle of Aviation museum. We gave the “single” version a try and it performs wonderfully in our sunny house, spinning all afternoon placed on a South-facing window, and in the late afternoon placed in a West-facing window. The company that makes them is Kikkerland; here it is for sale on Amazon.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

July, August Production vs. Projections

Here’s an update on how we did in the months of July, and August, versus the projections that Long Island Power Solutions gave us in their original estimate. I’m once again presenting the numbers on a per-panel basis:

July Projected: 34.61 kWh per panel
July Actual: 33.44 kWh per panel

August Projected: 31.94 kWh per panel
August Actual: 32.33 kWh per panel

So, for July we came in at about 97% of the projected amount (up from 96% for June and 90% for May). August was the first time we exceeded the projected amount, coming in at 101%. Lifetime (being May, June, July, August so far) we have produced about 96% of the projected amount (129.55 actual, vs 135.38 projected).

Posted in Energy Production | Leave a comment

June Production: Actual vs. Projected

It’s our second full month, and here’s how we did versus the projections for the month of June that Long Island Power Solutions gave us in their original estimate. I’ll present the numbers on a per-panel basis:

Projected: 35.33 kWh per panel
Actual: 33.78 kWh per panel

So, for June we came in at about 96% of the projected amount (up from 90% for May). Lifetime (being May and June so far) we have produced about 93% of the projected amount.

Posted in Energy Production | Leave a comment

LIPA Thanks Me

LIPA sent me a nice letter and “Solar Pioneer” certificate. It has an interesting statement on it… that I am contributing to the Department of Energy’s “Million Solar Roofs Initiative” to install one million solar energy systems on buildings across the U.S. by the year 2010.

LIPA solar pioneer certificate

2010?

Naturally, I was curious… did they meet the goal two years ago, or what? From what I can tell from googling, the Department of Energy used to have a website for this program, at http://www.millionsolarroofs.org, which had its heyday in terms of traffic back in 2005/2006. Then by the end of 2006 a “final report” document appears (here it is) and the home page changes to a press release about the new “Solar America Initiative” with its own new website; the domain millionsolarroofs.org disappears by 2007.

I went to the website address listed back in 2006 for the Solar America Initiative, and today there’s a message on its home page stating that the initiative concluded in 2009. From there, I can only find links to new programs, with 2015 goals… so with the trail having gone cold on whether the 2010 goal was ever met, I’m calling it a day on researching the result of the million solar roofs initiative any further. But I did also come across this document from California’s statewide “A Million Solar Roofs and Beyond” program, which is pretty interesting and makes it sound like they are doing quite well out in CA — having already installed 1GW of rooftop solar power there. They want to get to 20GW by 2020. Some nice charts and projections in the report; worth a look! 🙂 There was a fun quote from Thomas Edison in there too:

“We are like tenant farmers chopping down the fence around our house for fuel when we should be using nature’s inexhaustible sources of energy — sun, wind and tide. … I’d put my money on the sun and solar energy. What a source of power! I hope we don’t have to wait until oil and coal run out before we tackle that.”
— Thomas Edison

Posted in LIPA's Long Island Solar Pioneer Program | 1 Comment

Up Next: LED Replacement Bulbs

This post is about LED replacement bulbs which may seem a little off-topic, but a lot of the themes are similar to that of solar energy: saving energy (and saving money) through alternative energy technology. I’ll entice you with the math first, and then you can decide whether you want to read on :-): the LED replacement bulbs I ended up getting (after sampling first) cost me $17.50 each (in quantity, all-in with shipping)… they will “pay for themselves” in 2.74 years (by saving me an estimated $6.39 per year), and then after that they will last a further 20 years during which I will yield an annual savings of $6.39 per bulb, which is 36.5% annually against the investment of $17.50.

Incandescent vs LED bulb

It should first be said that CFL bulbs have similar energy savings and cost less… on Amazon right now you can buy a dimmable 65-watt-equivalent CFL replacement bulb which consumes 15 watts and lasts 10,000 hours, for $13.99. But over the lifespan of the comparable LED, you’d buy 2.5 of these CFL’s (because the LED’s last 25,000 hours) for a total of $34.98. And there are some huge negatives to CFLs, here’s my biggest: (1) horrible dimming capability, they still stay way too bright at the lowest dimmer setting, and make a headache-inducing buzzing sound; (2) take a long time to warm up, so if you’re in and out of a room quickly, they will be dim the whole time; (3) there’s mercury in there.

LED’s by comparison have no mercury, are “instant”-on (they take a fraction of a second but then they are at full brightness), and the ones we tried dim beautifully and are completely silent. So for me, that’s a vast improvement over CFL’s. CFL’s were always something I didn’t really truly want, but felt I should get anyway; LED’s by comparison I actually like and want to have.

So here’s my full story on these LED replacement bulbs.

I was in Home Depot the other day in the light bulb section, when I saw that the bulb I was looking for was available in LED… My first reaction was to think that what I was looking at must be a bulb for a special LED high-hat system — because the last I had heard about LED bulbs (less than a year ago, from someone having them installed), the entire can was different and had to be done by an electrician. But later on at home I opened up the computer and researched it, and to my surprise, what I had stumbled upon in the store was actual true replacement light bulbs but based on LED technology… I could literally swap out an old bulb, for one of these new ones.

If this came as a surprise to me, I figure it may also be a surprise to others — and so I wanted to share the whole experience (hence this post) in the hopes that others might be inspired to shop for an LED bulb the next time an incandescent burns out (or, if like me you are enticed by this idea as an investment opportunity, to do some replacements).

Before buying anything, I read lots of reviews online. What I found caused me to want to steer clear of brands I had never heard of before — lots of people reporting problems with the lights behaving strangely under existing dimmers (instead of actually dimming they would flicker or otherwise malfunction). So I ended up sampling a few different bulbs from Philips and GE, figuring that the prominent names in the industry were most likely to function well (and they both did).

Our house had mostly BR30’s in the high-hats (65 watt incandescents throughout), and some BR40’s (85 watt incandescents). As of this writing (June 2012), Home Depot is currently selling a 12-watt BR30 LED bulb from Philips for $26.97, their 13-watt version for $39.99, and their BR40 also for $39.99 [don’t balk yet — there’s ways to get discounts, plus, LIPA currently offers a bulk-purchase rebate program at $15 each LED bulb if you buy 20+]. I tried each of these Philips bulbs from Home Depot, as well as a 12-watt BR30 LED from GE that I won on eBay at ~$20/each.

A good strategy for buying from Home Depot is to acquire gift cards on eBay or through one of the gift card exchange websites like Plastic Jungle… [The idea being that people who get gift cards and would rather have cash, are willing to accept less than face value for some quick cash… on Plastic Jungle right now you can get pretty much an unlimited dollar amount worth of cards for a 7% discount to face value, while on eBay I saw a few that sold for as much as an 11% discount.] Combined with a discount coupon you get in the mail or online (right now “HDJUNE” gets you 10% off up to $100 spent at homedepot.com), those prices can potentially be brought down with the gift card strategy to the neighborhood of $22 and $32, pre-rebate from LIPA.

Here’s the packaging for each of the bulbs I tried:

GE LED BR30 Bulbs

12-Watt LED BR30 Bulbs from GE; 750 Lumens (LED12DBR30/827)

13-watt BR30 LED Bulbs from Philips, 730 Lumens

12-watt LED Bulbs from Philips, 650 Lumens

Here’s the Philips BR40 LED bulbs, 14.5 watts, 800 lumens

There were two “winners” for us — the 13-watt BR30’s from Philips, and the 12-watt BR30’s from GE. Between these two, the GE bulbs, notably, output 750 lumens (vs. Philips at 730) while using about 8% less power. [As a side note, I read that LED’s were first discovered/developed at GE so I guess their superiority with the technology continues to this day]. At full power, the bulbs we liked best overall were the GE’s. At the lowest dimmer setting, we liked the Philips bulbs better — they get a little more dim compared to the GE’s. The other two Philips bulbs were “losers” but only because the 12-watt didn’t produce as much light (it was still OK just not as nice), and the 14.5-watt we expected a lot more light from compared to the 12-watt GE’s — an extra 2.5 watts working after all — but only got slightly more light. So the GE’s were the overall winner, and we also kept a few of the 13-watt Philips bulbs in bedrooms for the nicer dimmest light.

Here are PDF specs on the GE LED BR30 bulbs, and the Philips LED BR30 bulbs.

Posted in LED Bulbs | Leave a comment

May Production: Actual vs. Projected

Today being the last day of May, I logged into the Enlighten system to see how we did for our first full month, versus the projections that Long Island Power Solutions gave us in their original estimate. I’ll present the numbers on a per-panel basis:

Projected: 33.5 kWh per panel
Actual: 30 kWh per panel

So for May we came in at about 90% of the projected amount… really just a handful of rainy days worth of difference. It will be interesting to see how this percentage varies month-to-month. If we were to maintain this rate of 90% of the projected production for the whole year, my “yield” number would come down to about an 18% return.

Posted in Energy Production | 1 Comment

Still No Certificate of Occupancy

I was expecting my certificate of occupancy to arrive by mail, having completed (I thought) everything they required… so when a letter came today from the town, I opened it expecting to find my certificate of occupancy inside. Instead, it was a notice that the town cannot proceed without further information; on the sheet there is a list of possible things they might need with boxes next to each… the box next to “plumbing inspection” has been checked. Plumbing inspection? I’ll call tomorrow to find out what plumbing, exactly, they are interested in inspecting…

Posted in Solar Permit | Leave a comment

Do The Solar Panels Ever Need To Be Cleaned?

A common question I’ve been asked since launching this blog, is about maintenance of the panels; specifically, do they ever need to be cleaned? Here is the official Sharp literature on the subject (emphasis added):

Sharp PV modules are designed for long life and require very little maintenance. If the angle of the PV module is 5 degrees or more, normal rainfall is usually sufficient to keep the module glass surface clean under most weather conditions. If dirt build-up becomes excessive, clean the glass surface only with a soft cloth using water.

So most likely it’ll be a long time, if ever, that we need to have them cleaned. We’ll have to remember to look up at them from time to time and see if they look dirty; also, with the “Enlighten” monitoring system we’ll be able to see if performance changes — if they start looking dirty and the performance goes down, we’ll know they need to be cleaned.

I asked Joe from Long Island Power Solutions if he had any insights to add based on their experience; he says:

This time of the year, we see a lot of that green pollen. This causes some shading of the cells. Rain will take care of that but between rain, it wouldn’t hurt to hose down the array if it can be done safely from the ground.

Posted in About My Solar Energy System | Leave a comment

Net Read Meter Installed Today!

Hooray, LIPA came this afternoon and switched out our old analog meter for a digital net-read meter! By this evening when I checked again it was -5 kWh in our favor 🙂

I’m impressed by how quickly LIPA did this… the “closeout” documents were filed only this past Friday, so for them to have already come out to change the meter on Wednesday is a really rapid turnaround, especially considering that it was in their interest to drag their feet — let me feed the grid for awhile without getting credit for it. So kudos to LIPA!

Posted in LIPA's Long Island Solar Pioneer Program | 1 Comment